Enchancing English Vocabulary Retention and Phonetic Accuracy Using Interactive Flashcards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v6i1.7016Keywords:
English Pronunciation, Flashcards, Interactive Learning Media, Qualitative Descriptive Approach, Vocabulary AcquisitionAbstract
This qualitative descriptive study investigated the impact of interactive flashcards on the vocabulary acquisition and pronunciation accuracy of fifteen high school students. By synthesizing classroom observations and semi-structured interviews, the research identified how multisensory tools facilitate stronger cognitive links through visual and phonetic association. Findings reveal that these digital resources effectively lower the affective filter, allowing students to engage in low-stakes private practice that builds the confidence necessary for public speaking. For educators, this research demonstrates that replacing static word lists with interactive media can mitigate orthographic interference and address complex phonemes through self-paced, autonomous learning. For researchers, the study provides a robust narrative on the role of gamified scaffolding in reducing cognitive load and sustaining student motivation. The emergence of spontaneous peer-tutoring further suggests that interactive tools can transform solitary study into a collaborative social process. Ultimately, this study offers a scalable model for modern curriculum design, suggesting that multisensory engagement is essential for helping students transition from basic communication to academic linguistic mastery. These insights encourage the adoption of dynamic, tech-driven materials to foster an inclusive and high-engagement language learning environment.
Downloads
References
Adams, J. G. (2025). Qualitative interviewing techniques in educational research. Journal of Pedagogy and Language, 12(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpl.2024.01.005
Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Vitta, J. P. (2024). Measuring language learning motivation: A review of the state of the art. Language Teaching, 57(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482300015X
Chen, L. (2024). Digital gamification and vocabulary acquisition: A longitudinal study of interactive media. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 52(3), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395231221045
Chen, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). Teacher feedback and student uptake in the second language classroom: A systematic review. Modern Language Journal, 107(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12845
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2022). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Language Teaching, 55(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482100012X
García, M., & Roberts, J. (2025). The impact of AI-integrated flashcards on phonetic accuracy in adult learners. Modern Language Journal, 109(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12988
Hwang, G. J., & Wang, S. Y. (2021). Facilitating EFL students' learning of English idioms and their pronunciation with a digital game-based learning approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1335–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10007-9
Klimova, B. (2021). Mobile applications for learning English: A review of current research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.16334
Lee, S., & Wang, H. (2024). Spaced repetition algorithms and cognitive load: Optimizing digital learning tools. Computers & Education, 210, 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.10491
Nguyen, T. (2024). Mobile-assisted language learning: A meta-analysis of interactive flashcard efficacy. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.125/llt.v28i2.7890
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2024). Statistical power in second language research: An update and call to action. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46(3), 612–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000412
Puspitasari, D., & Kurniawan, A. (2023). The impact of digital flashcards on vocabulary acquisition in secondary education. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 11(4), 112–128.
Rahman, M. S. (2022). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
Reynolds, B. L., & Teng, M. F. (2023). Vocabulary learning through reading: The role of word-relatedness and task difficulty. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(4), 889–912. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0056
Sandelowski, M. (2020). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 43(1), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22001
Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J. (2022). Writing the reports of qualitative studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(4), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15136
Smith, A., & Tanaka, K. (2025). Gamified flashcards and student motivation: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. System, 122, 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103212
Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. (2020). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919896321
Zhang, D., & Richards, J. C. (2024). Designing materials for pronunciation teaching in the digital age. ELT Journal, 78(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/eltj/ccad042
Zulkifli, N. A., & Said, N. E. (2024). Exploring high school students' challenges in English pronunciation: A qualitative study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 20(2), 334–350.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
_001.jpg)






