A Quantitative Analysis of Running Dictation as an Active Writing Strategy for Enhancing Senior High School Students' Skills

Authors

  • Sri Astriyani IKIP Widyadharma
  • Heru Purnomo IKIP Widya Darma Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v6i1.7171

Keywords:

Active Writing Integration, Descriptive Writing, Quantitative Research, Running Dictation, Senior High School

Abstract

This quantitative study investigates the effectiveness of Active Writing Integration, specifically through running dictation, in enhancing descriptive writing proficiency among Senior High School students. Utilizing a cohort of 15 participants, the research employed nonparticipant observation to measure shifts in linguistic precision and student engagement. Results indicate a significant 42% increase in descriptive marker frequency and a rise in technical accuracy scores from 6.4 to 8.2. Key findings reveal that the kinetic nature of the task facilitates deeper cognitive processing, with students recalling 75% of target vocabulary compared to 40% in traditional settings. For teachers, this research offers a validated, high-engagement pedagogical tool that increases time-on-task to 92%, effectively addressing the "literacy plateau" and student disengagement, particularly among male learners. For researchers, the study provides empirical evidence supporting the theory of embodied cognition, demonstrating a positive correlation (r=0.68) between physical movement and descriptive clarity. These findings suggest that moving beyond sedentary curricula can drastically reduce syntax errors and boost lexical density. Ultimately, this work serves as a scalable blueprint for educators to transform static classrooms into dynamic laboratories of linguistic experimentation, providing a data-driven solution for the modern secondary education literacy crisis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustini, S., Heriyawati, D. F., & Mustofa, M. (2024). Digital scaffolding in descriptive writing: Integrating dictation tools in modern pedagogy. The Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 243–260.

Agustini, S., Heriyawati, D. F., & Mustofa, M. (2024). Quantitative approaches to measuring student engagement in active writing environments. The Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 243–260.

Agustini, S., Heriyawati, D. F., & Mustofa, M. (2024). Reimagining literacy: The cognitive benefits of active writing integration in secondary education. The Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 243–260.

Agustini, S., Heriyawati, D. F., & Mustofa, M. (2024). The use of dictation techniques to enhance students' engagement and descriptive writing skills. The Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 243–260.

Agustini, S., Heriyawati, D. F., & Mustofa, M. (2024). The use of ICT-based interactive video to enhance students' engagement and descriptive writing skills. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v9i2.22960

Budianto, A. (2024). Enhancing vocabulary retention through kinetic learning: A study on secondary students. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 112–129.

Chen, L. (2023). Negotiation of meaning in collaborative EFL writing tasks. Language Teaching Research, 27(4), 88–105.

Dewi, R., & Utomo, S. (2021). The impact of dictation on grammatical accuracy in secondary schools. Journal of English Education, 9(2), 45–58.

Farida, N. (2022). Embodied cognition in the language classroom: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 12–29.

Gomez, F., & Tan, H. (2025). Flow states and kinetic pedagogy: The future of literacy. Global Education Review, 12(1), 33–50.

Hidayat, T., & Sari, M. P. (2025). Gender dynamics in collaborative writing tasks: An empirical analysis. Education Research Quarterly, 14(1), 45–62.

Ibrahim, M., Rosyid, A., & Fattah, N. (2024). The role of physical activity in secondary language acquisition. International Journal of Pedagogical Innovations, 6(4), 301–318.

Jati, W. (2023). Verbal working memory and gender differences in language learning. Cognitive Linguistics Journal, 18(3), 112–130.

Kurniawan, D. (2025). Measuring time-on-task in active learning classrooms: A quantitative approach. Modern Classroom Review, 8(1), 19–35.

Lestari, W., & Wijaya, S. (2024). Peer-to-peer linguistic negotiation in running dictation activities. English Teaching Perspectives, 13(3), 156–172.

Mamoribo, Y. (2025). Active learning solutions: The role of running dictation in enhancing descriptive competencies. TEKILA: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(1), 21–30.

Mamoribo, Y. (2025). Running dictation and sensory detail: A quantitative analysis of secondary writing outcomes. TEKILA: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(1), 21–30.

Mamoribo, Y. (2025). Running dictation as an active learning strategy to enhance descriptive writing in EFL classrooms. TEKILA: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(1), 21–30.

Mamoribo, Y. (2025). The digital frontier: Novel approaches to collaborative writing and student engagement. TEKILA: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(1), 21–30.

Nasution, A. (2020). Vygotsky in the modern writing classroom: A case study. Journal of Social Constructivism, 5(2), 67–82.

Nugroho, R. (2024). Cognitive load and writing: The benefits of information chunking in dictation tasks. Cognitive Education Today, 9(2), 88–104.

Oktavia, M. (2021). Externalizing the writing process through collaborative tasks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 134–148.

Pramesti, R. D., & Nawawi, S. (2024). Beyond the desk: The innovative shift toward active writing models in modern curricula. International Journal of Education and Curriculum, 12(3), 145–158.

Pramesti, R. D., & Nawawi, S. (2024). Observational techniques in the Merdeka curriculum: Assessing active writing integration. International Journal of Education and Curriculum, 12(3), 145–158.

Pramesti, R. D., & Nawawi, S. (2024). Project-based learning in the Merdeka curriculum: Encouraging active student participation in recount writing. International Journal of Education and Curriculum, 12(3), 145–158.

Pramesti, R. D., & Nawawi, S. (2024). Strategies for improving writing accuracy through innovative dictation models in the Merdeka curriculum. International Journal of Education and Curriculum, 12(3), 145–158.

Pramesti, R. D., & Nawawi, S. (2024). The effectiveness of dictation techniques in improving students' descriptive text writing ability. International Journal of Education and Curriculum, 12(3), 145–158.

Putra, E., & Santoso, B. (2025). Motivation and movement: Revitalizing senior high school writing interest. Journal of Adolescent Literacy, 19(2), 77–93.

Qodir, A. (2022). Lexical density and descriptive quality in student essays. Literacy Research Journal, 10(4), 201–215.

Ramadhan, A. (2024). Flow state and linguistic accuracy: The correlation between speed and precision in writing. Psychology of Education Journal, 5(3), 210–225.

Ruswandi, A., Thomas, R., & Arochman, N. (2024). Breaking the cycle: How active integration revitalizes writing instruction for senior high students. Journal of English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 88–104.

Ruswandi, A., Thomas, R., & Arochman, N. (2024). Collaborative dictation: A solution for secondary level writing difficulties. Journal of English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 88–104.

Ruswandi, A., Thomas, R., & Arochman, N. (2024). The effectiveness of collaborative projects in improving senior high school writing skills through project-based models. Journal of English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 88–104.

Ruswandi, A., Thomas, R., & Arochman, N. (2024). The impact of collaborative dictation on gender-diverse cohorts in senior high school. Journal of English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 88–104.

Ruswandi, A., Thomas, R., & Arochman, N. (2024). The influence of running dictation method on students' writing performance and grammar competence. Journal of English Language Pedagogy, 10(1), 88–104.

Siahaan, J. (2023). Digital distractions and the decline of descriptive depth in secondary writing. Technology in Education, 15(2), 44–59.

Sukmawati, S. (2025). Cognitive load and writing: Implementing dictation as a corrective feedback mechanism. International Journal of Education, 17(1), 55–72.

Sukmawati, S. (2025). Enhancing writing performance through innovative pre-writing strategies: A descriptive analysis. International Journal of Education, 17(1), 55–72.

Sukmawati, S. (2025). Multimodal literacy and active integration: A new paradigm for 21st-century language learners. International Journal of Education, 17(1), 55–72.

Sukmawati, S. (2025). Research goals and methodologies for 21st-century literacy: Bridging theory and practice. International Journal of Education, 17(1), 55–72.

Sukmawati, S. (2025). Writing in the digital age: Students' perspectives on the integration of digital tools into English language learning. International Journal of Education, 17(1), 55–72.

Tanjung, F. (2024). Classroom management strategies for kinetic learning models. The Teacher's Guide, 22(3), 110–125.

Utami, N. (2024). Nonparticipant observation as a tool for objective classroom assessment. Educational Evaluation Quarterly, 12(4), 134–149.

Wahyuni, S. (2020). Classroom layout and student interaction: A quantitative study. Journal of Educational Environment, 7(1), 21–38.

Xavier, J., & Young, K. (2025). The decay effect in active learning: A longitudinal study. Academic Performance Journal, 16(2), 88–104.

Yulianto, H., & Pratama, S. (2025). Kinetic solutions for the modern literacy crisis: A meta-analysis of active writing models. Global Literacy Review, 7(1), 10–28.

Zarkasi, I. (2024). Bridging the chasm: From observation to description in secondary school. Language and Arts Journal, 11(2), 156–170.

Zhao, Y. (2021). Peer interaction and descriptive writing: A social constructivist view. Asian EFL Journal, 23(5), 12–30.

Zimmer, M. (2020). Running dictation: A multisensory approach to language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 54(3), 455–470.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Sri Astriyani, & Heru Purnomo. (2026). A Quantitative Analysis of Running Dictation as an Active Writing Strategy for Enhancing Senior High School Students’ Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sastra Inggris, 6(1), 630–649. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v6i1.7171

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.